Показать сокращенную информацию
dc.contributor.author | Кузаков, Дмитрий Евгеньевич | ru_RU |
dc.contributor.author | Дьяков, Михаил Станиславович | ru_RU |
dc.contributor.author | Лаврентьев, Михаил Михайлович | ru_RU |
dc.contributor.author | Kuzakov, Dmitriy Evgenevich | en |
dc.contributor.author | Diakov, Mihail Stanislavovich | en |
dc.contributor.author | Lavrentyev, Mikhail Mikhailovich | en |
dc.creator | Новосибирский государственный университет | ru_RU |
dc.creator | ООО «СофтЛаб-НСК» | ru_RU |
dc.creator | Институт автоматики и электрометрии СО РАН | ru_RU |
dc.creator | Novosibirsk State University | en |
dc.creator | SoftLab-NSK Co. Ltd | en |
dc.creator | Institute of Automation and Electrometry SB RAS | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-01-23T11:34:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-01-23T11:34:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-06 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Кузаков Д. Е., Дьяков М. С., Лаврентьев М. М. Поиск путей для группы автономных транспортных средств при исследовании неизвестной территорий // Вестн. Новосиб. гос. ун-та. Серия: Информационные технологии. 2016. Т. 14, № 2. С. 59–71. | ru_RU |
dc.identifier.citation | Kuzakov D. E., Diakov M. S., Lavrentyev M. M. Path Planning for Multi-Robot Exploration Using Frontier Space Clusterization // Vestnik NSU Series: Information Technologies. - 2016. - Volume 14, Issue No 2. - P. 59-71. - ISSN 1818-7900. (in Russian). | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1818-7900 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://lib.nsu.ru/xmlui/handle/nsu/11538 | |
dc.description.abstract | Представлен алгоритм исследования заранее неизвестной территории с помощью группы автономных транспортных средств (АТС). В нем используется новый метод выбора точек назначения для каждого АТС из группы. Новизна данного метода заключается в использовании кластеризации граничной области – области карты препятствий, находящейся на границе ее исследованной части. Каждому АТС сопоставляется некоторый кластер с помощью поиска паросочетания минимального веса. Точка назначения выбирается из кластера с помощью функции приоритета – функции, определяющей выгодность выбора клетки в зависимости от затрат на ее достижение, количества полученной информации и расстояния до целей других АТС. | ru_RU |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper, a path planning algorithm for multi-robot exploration is presented. It is developed for exploration in initially unknown areas. The algorithm is based on a novel method of choosing exploration targets. This method uses clusterization of frontier space – part of explored map space which is situated on its border with an unexplored part. Every robot is being associated with a cluster. Then the exploration target for the robot is chosen from associated cluster with a priority function. This function defines utility for choosing a map cell considering traverse cost, information gain and distance to other robots' targets. | en |
dc.language.iso | ru | ru_RU |
dc.publisher | Новосибирский государственный университет | ru_RU |
dc.subject | исследование территории | ru_RU |
dc.subject | кластеризация граничной области | ru_RU |
dc.subject | гранично-ориентированный алгоритм | ru_RU |
dc.subject | группа автономных транспортных средств | ru_RU |
dc.subject | multi-robot exploration | en |
dc.subject | frontier space clusterization | en |
dc.subject | frontier-based algorithm | en |
dc.title | Поиск путей для группы автономных транспортных средств при исследовании неизвестной территорий | ru_RU |
dc.title.alternative | Path Planning for Multi-Robot Exploration Using Frontier Space Clusterization | en |
dc.type | Article | ru_RU |
dc.description.reference | 1. Gabrielly Y., Rimon E. Spanning-tree based coverage of continuous areas by a mobile robot // Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 2001. No. 31. P. 77–98. 2. Hazon N., Kaminka G. On redundancy, efficiency and robustness in coverage for multi-robot // Robot Autonomous System. 2008. No. 56. P. 1102–1114. 3. Murphy L., Newman P. Using incomplete online metric maps for topological exploration with the gap navigation tree // IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2008. P. 2717–2722. 4. Santosh D., Achar S., Jawahar C. V. Autonomous image-based exploration for mobile robot navigation // IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2008. P. 47–60. 5. Andries M., Charpillet F. Multi-robot exploration of unknown environments with identication of exploration completion and post-exploration rendezvous using ant algorithms // IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). 2013. P. 5571–5578. 6. Liu T. M., Lyons D. M. Leveraging Area Bounds Information for Autonomous Multi-Robot Exploration. 7. Senthilkumar K., Bharadwaj K. Multi-robot terrain coverage by constructing multiple spanning trees simultaneously // International Journal of Robotics and Automation. 2010. Vol. 3. No. 25. P. 195–203. 8. Lau H. Behavioural approach for multi-robot exploration // Proc. of the 2003 Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2003. 9. Yamauchi B. A frontier-based approach for autonomous exploration // IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, 1997. P. 146–151. 10. Gonzalez-Banos H. H., Latombe J. C. Navigation strategies for exploring indoor environments // The International Journal of Robotics Research. 2002. Vol. 21, 10–11. P. 829–848. 11. Marjovi A., Marques L. Multi-robot topological exploration using olfactory cues // Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems. 2013. P. 47–60. 12. Burgard W., Moors M., Fox D., Simmons R., Thrun S. Collaborative multi-robot exploration // IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2000. Vol. 1. P. 476–481. 13. Al Khawaldah M., Al-Khedher M., Al-Adwan I., Al Rawashdeh A. An Autonomous Exploration Strategy for Cooperative Mobile Robots // Journal of Software Engineering and Applications. 2014. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 142–149. 14. Solanas A., Garcia M. A. Coordinated multi-robot exploration through unsupervised clustering of unknown space // IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2004. Vol. 1. P. 717–721. 15. Steinhaus H. Sur la division des corp materiels en parties // Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. 1956. Vol. 1. P. 801–804. 16. Kuhn H. W. The Hungarian method for the assignment problem // Naval Research Logistics. 1955. Vol. 2, 1–2. P. 83–97. 17. Dolgov D., Thrun S., Montemerlo M., Diebel J. Path Planning for Autonomous Vehicles in Unknown Semi-structured Environments // The International Journal of Robotics Research. 2010. No. 29. P. 485–501. 18. Bradski G. Clustering and Search in Multi-Dimensional Spaces // Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools. 2000. | ru_RU |
dc.description.reference | 1. Gabrielly Y., Rimon E. Spanning-tree based coverage of continuous areas by a mobile robot // Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 2001. No. 31. P. 77–98. 2. Hazon N., Kaminka G. On redundancy, efficiency and robustness in coverage for multi-robot // Robot Autonomous System. 2008. No. 56. P. 1102–1114. 3. Murphy L., Newman P. Using incomplete online metric maps for topological exploration with the gap navigation tree // IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2008. P. 2717–2722. 4. Santosh D., Achar S., Jawahar C. V. Autonomous image-based exploration for mobile robot navigation // IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2008. P. 47–60. 5. Andries M., Charpillet F. Multi-robot exploration of unknown environments with identication of exploration completion and post-exploration rendezvous using ant algorithms // IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). 2013. P. 5571–5578. 6. Liu T. M., Lyons D. M. Leveraging Area Bounds Information for Autonomous Multi-Robot Exploration. 7. Senthilkumar K., Bharadwaj K. Multi-robot terrain coverage by constructing multiple spanning trees simultaneously // International Journal of Robotics and Automation. 2010. Vol. 3. No. 25. P. 195–203. 8. Lau H. Behavioural approach for multi-robot exploration // Proc. of the 2003 Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2003. 9. Yamauchi B. A frontier-based approach for autonomous exploration // IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, 1997. P. 146–151. 10. Gonzalez-Banos H. H., Latombe J. C. Navigation strategies for exploring indoor environments // The International Journal of Robotics Research. 2002. Vol. 21, 10–11. P. 829–848. 11. Marjovi A., Marques L. Multi-robot topological exploration using olfactory cues // Distributed Autonomous Robotic Systems. 2013. P. 47–60. 12. Burgard W., Moors M., Fox D., Simmons R., Thrun S. Collaborative multi-robot exploration // IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. 2000. Vol. 1. P. 476–481. 13. Al Khawaldah M., Al-Khedher M., Al-Adwan I., Al Rawashdeh A. An Autonomous Exploration Strategy for Cooperative Mobile Robots // Journal of Software Engineering and Applications. 2014. Vol. 7. No. 3. P. 142–149. 14. Solanas A., Garcia M. A. Coordinated multi-robot exploration through unsupervised clustering of unknown space // IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2004. Vol. 1. P. 717–721. 15. Steinhaus H. Sur la division des corp materiels en parties // Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. 1956. Vol. 1. P. 801–804. 16. Kuhn H. W. The Hungarian method for the assignment problem // Naval Research Logistics. 1955. Vol. 2, 1–2. P. 83–97. 17. Dolgov D., Thrun S., Montemerlo M., Diebel J. Path Planning for Autonomous Vehicles in Unknown Semi-structured Environments // The International Journal of Robotics Research. 2010. No. 29. P. 485–501. 18. Bradski G. Clustering and Search in Multi-Dimensional Spaces // Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools. 2000. | en |
dc.relation.ispartofvolume | 14 | |
dc.relation.ispartofnumber | 2 | |
dc.relation.ispartofpages | 59-71 |